ADR is considered more appropriate in settling disputes
ADR is considered more appropriate in settling disputes
- Advertisement -

Togbe Hotormaho Amedzake, Chairman of the Court-Connected ADR Practitioners of Ghana, a group of mediators attached to the courts, has called for a change in the perception of ADR as an alternative to litigation.

Rather, he said ADR is an appropriate mechanism for dispute resolution and not an alternative.

According to him, ADR should be first resorted to by disputing parties for an amicable and non-adversarial settlement of disputes.

- advertisement -
Togbe Hotormaho Amedzake
Togbe Hotormaho Amedzake

In an interview with ADR Daily in Accra, he explained that litigation should rather be the alternative to ADR mechanisms.

According to him, before the advent of the judicial system, society used ADR mechanisms to settle disputes, therefore making litigation in court an alternative to resort to in case of failed mediation or arbitration.

“ADR is appropriate and not an alternative,” he stressed.

He urged ADR practitioners to promote the practice as an “Appropriate” mechanism, adding that increased acceptance of ADR as an appropriate concept would help to deal with most disputes across the country to enhance national peace.

“The Appropriateness should be the hallmark of the profession,” he said.

Togbe Amedzake, who is also the Director of the Amedzake ADR Centre in Accra, called for a mandatory ADR system to be instituted in Ghana’s judicial system.

That, he said, would ensure that all civil cases would undergo mandatory mediation or arbitration as a pre-condition for litigation.

Currently, the Judicial Service operates a form of a mandatory mediation, known as the pre-trial conference, in the commercial courts, but Togbe Amedzake says that is not enough.

He believes the system has to be generalised to cover all civil cases.

He also criticised the present pre-trial conference system which involves judges presiding over the mediation, adding that the system does not ensure effectiveness.

According to him, since the judges, are the same people who preside over litigation cases, they are overburdened and would not have good time and patience, which are among the tenets of the ADR profession, for the mediation at the pre-trial conferences.

Togbe Amedzake believes there is the need for professional mediators to be engaged to preside over the pre-trial conferences so that in case of failure, a case would be pushed to a judge for full trial.

By: Nii Adotey/

VIANii Adotey
Previous articleHigh Court dismisses Olympics’ injunction on league
Next articleLagos to host Africa’s notorious Arbitrators
ADR Daily is a specialized news portal with a focus on providing authentic news, information and research analysis on Appropriate Dispute Resolution (ADR), Human Resource Management (HRM) and Industrial Relations Management (IRM) in Ghana and beyond. This platform serves as an information resource base for the progress of the ADR, HRM and IRM industries, and seeks to promote professionalism in ADR practice by supporting a network of ADR professionals within and across nations and continents. ADR Daily keenly encourages the mass adoption of ADR mechanisms, particularly negotiation, mediation and arbitration for the resolution of disputes in all spheres, through the publication of industry news and information, as well as by deploying innovative awareness creation engagements.