- Advertisement -

Since 2012, South Africa, dissatisfied with its bilateral investment treaties (BITs), has either been terminating or non-renewing several of these, including those concluded with United Kingdom and France.

In substitution, South Africa passed a law on the protection of investments in December 2015. This law establishes a uniform system for the investments in South Africa with a specific dispute resolution mechanism between the State and the investors (Article 13 of the said law). An investor who feels wronged by an action of the South African Government may now request that his dispute be resolved either by mediation or by any competent court, independent tribunal or statutory body in South Africa. As to the use of international arbitration, it should be noted that the investor will not only need to exhaust all domestic remedies but also have the State consent to the arbitration. If that is the case, the arbitration will then be conducted between the investor’s state and the Republic of South Africa.

The major feature lies in the establishment of a mediation system in disputes between the State and the investor.

On 30 December 2016, the South African Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) issued Draft Regulations on Mediation Rules which would apply to this type of disputes . These Draft Regulations on Mediation Rules contain some special features:

  • Action brought within 6 months: to declare a dispute, the investor would only have 6 months from becoming aware of the dispute to complete a prescribed form available from the DTI.
  • Mediator from the DTI’s list: the investor and the DTI would have to agree on the name of a mediator, this mediator would need to be in the list available from the DTI. Compulsory mediation rules: the investor would be unable to choose independent mediation rules such as the ones from the International Bar Association (IBA Rules for Investor State Mediation) and would need to comply with the mediation rules issued by the DTI.
  • Conclusion of mediation: if the mediation happens to be successful, the Draft Regulations do not specify whether the parties should, for example, sign a settlement agreement. Similarly, in the event of an unsuccessful outcome, the remedies available to the investor are not specified.

It seems that the Draft Regulations on Mediation Rules would gain in being more flexible for parties. It should be noted that, save for mediation, this new system is highly unfavorable to the investor. The Draft Regulations were open for public comment until 28 February 2017. It may be that the Draft Regulations on Mediation Rules come into force at the same time as the Protection of Investment Act.

Source: Mediate.com

Previous articleSEC to set higher standards for securities industry
Next articlePeace in Mali on the “right path” – French defence minister
ADR Daily is a one stop news portal with a focus on providing world-class Appropriate Dispute Resolution, Human Resource Management and Labour Relations news, and also a resource base for all ADR, Human Resource and Labour Relations (Industrial Relations) issues. With the growing trends on increased demand on the ADR, HRM and IRM practice, there is the need for a resource center where practitioners can access news, follow-up on and contribute to development in their field of practice. The ADR Daily news portal seeks to become a pivotal partner in not only addressing those needs of professionals, but also creates a network of professionals across the continent and the world that will bring together their expertise to enhance best practice.